pixia-club.info Religion Soulless Gail Carriger Pdf


Wednesday, June 12, 2019

Buffy meets Jane Austen in the first book in Gail Carriger’s wickedly funny NYT bestselling Parasol Protectorate series. Will her soulless ability to negate supernatural powers prove useful or just plain embarrassing? SOULLESS is the first book of the Parasol Protectorate series. Editorial Reviews. From Publishers Weekly. Starred Review. Carriger debuts brilliantly with a Kindle App Ad. Look inside this book. Soulless (Parasol Protectorate Series Book 1) by [Carriger, Gail]. Audible Sample. Audible Sample. Playing. download book soulless book 1 of the parasol pixia-club.info list of parasol protectorate: book the first - gail carriger gail carriger is a new.

Soulless Gail Carriger Pdf

Language:English, Spanish, French
Country:Sierra Leone
Published (Last):15.11.2015
ePub File Size:21.61 MB
PDF File Size:19.16 MB
Distribution:Free* [*Regsitration Required]
Uploaded by: EVELINE

Mar 25, [PDF DOWNLOAD] Soulless (The Parasol Protectorate) Free Epub /MOBI/EBooks. Soulless (The Parasol Protectorate) by Gail Carriger. books are available as a download from audible in the us and uk soulless parasol protectorate 1 by gail carriger pdf download - soulless parasol protectorate 1. soulless parasol protectorate 1 by gail carriger soulless parasol protectorate 1 pdf. Happy 27th to the woman who changed the world as Hermione, Belle, and a .

Where to go from there? From bad to worse apparently, for Alexia accidentally kills the vampire — and then the appalling Lord Maccon loud, messy, gorgeous, and werewolf is sent by Queen Victoria to investigate. With unexpected vampires appearing and expected vampires disappearing, everyone seems to believe Alexia responsible.

Can she figure out what is actually happening to London's high society PDF? Will her soulless ability to negate supernatural powers prove useful or just plain embarrassing?

Finally, who is the real enemy, and do they have treacle tart? Reviews of the Soulless Parasol Protectorate Series 1 So far we've virtually no evaluations in "Soulless Parasol Protectorate Series 1 ": nevertheless it's unlikely that any of the user reviews didn't go away. On the other hand, in case you delivered electronically this kind of request and possess caused him, it is possible to function as a 1st user, that could leave the opinions.

We'll publish it, regardless of whether it truly is adverse. These days, just about any celebration is a wonderful possibility to exhibit his or her views openly, in order that every single end user can promptly solve meets him or her the appliance or otherwise not.

I had a very good visual picture of the steam-driven, clockwork technology in my head while I was reading. Yet, she didn't overdo it so that I was more focused on trying to picture these devices and not focused on the story. Vampires and werewolves are the main supernatural beasties in this story. They are very politically and socially-organized, to the degree that they have advisors to the queen herself.

I admit, I really had to focus on this aspect, needing to reread a few paragraphs to really gain an understanding of the social structure of the two supernatural groups. But it was time well spent. I liked reading about the social dynamics of the vampire society, divided up into hives, each with a Queen vampire she's the only one who can make new vamps , and having human servants called drones.

Lord Akeldama, Alexia's flamboyant friend who happens to be a very powerful vampire, was a hoot. His fashion sense was outrageous, and he kept me laughing. On the werewolf side, I was enamored with Professor Lyall, the competent, extremely intelligent beta to the Alpha werewolf, Lord Maccon, Earl of Woolsey.

I hope to see a lot more of Prof. The werewolf pack dynamics were especially interesting to me, werewolf lover that I am. I absolutely love the werewolf salute given to Alexia at the end of this book. I was practically clapping. I think you could see that the vamps and weres were very integrated into society, and a huge part of the governmental workings of the author's concept of Great Britain of the 19th Century. It really gives a different perspective on the British Empire. Man, this was a great read.

If you're coming from a romance or a contemporary urban fantasy background, this book will take you out of your comfort zones, but it's so worth it. Hang in there until you get used to the flow of the language it's very 19th century , and relax and enjoy the witty humor it's very funny. You will have a great time.

Don't forget to bring your tricked-out parasol and glassicals, just in case. View all 56 comments. Nov 12, Felicia rated it really liked it Shelves: I wish I had written this book! Only because it combines two of my latest fetishes: Corsets and Paranormal creatures. After the first chapter this book is pretty good, I really enjoyed it although it's not reinventing the wheel in any way. Nice romance, appealing characters, melding of the two genres was enough to keep my very entertained and up late!

I will read another for sure! View all 13 comments. Loved it! Why did I wait so long to read this??? Smart as hell. Best werewolf ever!


So sexy and gruff and grumpy. Big huge manly werewolf. The butler, Floote, Lyall the Beta werewolf Lord Akeldama , best flaming vampire evah! There's just enough of a little oomph to tweak what we've Loved it! There's just enough of a little oomph to tweak what we've all read about vamps and weres. The author reinvents several historical events with a supernatural spin.

No instalove, no damsel in distress And tons of witty ways to word things. Really good stuff.

Get A Copy

Gosh, I could go on. I really have nothing negative to say about this. Definitely continuing the series. I haven't liked a PNR this much in a long time. There are no steamy love scenes, but what you do get feels just right. Buddy read with the MacHalo group.

I don't know how big a part vampires play in the overall plot, but I'm counting this towards vampire month part 2. By the way, vampires play a major part in this. I wasn't sure, but yes, they do. View all 38 comments. May 20, Eh? Rbrs 4 Remember in grade school, when the teacher would ask for a volunteer to give the first speech or present the first diorama or whatever?

Public Speaking - that which is feared more than death. Comparisons were always inevitable. I learned to shoot that hand up like a game of "not-it," so that everyone would be compared to me but my stuff would gently fade in the mob memory.

Also, to get it out of the way so then I could relax while everyone else sweated it and got ever more anxious. Soooo, Rbrs 4 Remember in grade school, when the teacher would ask for a volunteer to give the first speech or present the first diorama or whatever? Soooo, I was slow with this book and there have been a bunch of excellent reviews written. Comparisons are inevitable. They're really good and you should read them.

These reviews tear the book apart brilliantly. Most of the discussions about the definition of "Romance" have been beyond my ability to participate, pulling in outside sources and critical thinking magnificence, but clear enough that I can nod and say "yeah!

I'll try not to be a complete parrot here, as I try to place this book in my limited understanding of the Romance universe. Well, I can't even parrot very well because much of it whooshes over my head. I would consider this book to be Romance, but not the giggly-silly spooning and forking of PtP or barfbag secks of SO'M. The only real relations occurred at the very end after the couple was married.

Well, in the carriage on the way to the nuptual bed. Because they couldn't wait. The humping so many ways to not say the word! I think the point is to describe an adventure and relationship that the Romance reader can slip on, or project herself. I read a couple of the other reviews by serial Romance readers — which was quite the task, whew — and they went on and on and on about how the dude made her, the readers, feel.

Sorry for the mixing of singular and plural, but the readers are mostly ladies and the ladies seemed to see themselves as Alexia. Most of her physical qualities are generally described so that a large chunk of the couch-potato population could do that thing where they see themselves in the story.

The clothes are excruciatingly detailed, sometimes the furniture. It's like sitcom t.

Which is all okay! Don't attack me, puppets and trolls. I thought this book was not-terrible and performs admirably in its chosen niche Essentially, it's a girl meeting and marrying a guy. Each chapter is a contained scene, with all the action and dialogue occurring in one room per scene. The story wasn't really remarkable. There are vampires, werewolves, descriptions of how they fit into this world.

The girl and guy don't like each other at first, but that's just because they're extremely attracted to each other and the dislike is an indicator of their future passion. The whole thing about the girl being soulless? Not well thought out or executed, more a convenient superpower for our superheroine. The clunky witticisms made me cringe, not because they were really bad, but they were slightly bad and there were so many of them There were some instances of clumsy writing that popped out like a stray "splay," since Ms.

Carriger took great pains to write so properly and use Big Words: She winced at the flavor, looked with narrowed eyes at her cup, and then reached for the creamer. I glare at crockery, too. She widened her large brown eyes Doesn't this sound like her eyelashes moved independently? And my favorite: Alexia's ivory taffeta gown was held together by a row of tiny mother-of-pearl buttons up the length of its back.

Well, hell! That sure is consummate skill, undoing back-buttons when her back is pressed to the ground! Okay, that last one is probably just me, a scene where the author decided to move the pace along by not describing every single movement Couldn't you describe Alexia lifting her back up so the earl could undo the row of tiny mother-of-pearl buttons up the length of the ivory taffeta gown?

I was jostled from my I mean, Alexia's, disrobing when you didn't tell me exactly every single movement. I, uh, liked the flamboyant gay vampire and his harem of cooing men. There was also a scene of real beauty to me near the end, with the sunset. Hee, following the cover credits on the back, the photographed woman titles herself the Gothic Supermodel and you can purchase the costume.

View all 31 comments. May 22, Kat Kennedy rated it really liked it Shelves: If you've been on GoodReads for any decent amount of time then you probably know Tatiana. If you don't then she is a very popular, entertaining reviewer with almost flawless taste in books and you should go read and like all her reviews abunch. Usually, we tend to agree on a lot of books.

So you can understand my obvious distress when I read this book and quite lik If you've been on GoodReads for any decent amount of time then you probably know Tatiana. So you can understand my obvious distress when I read this book and quite liked it when Tatiana didn't.

It's hard to say what I actually liked about Soulless because it's hard to categorize what it actually is. Some people said it was a Romance, which I struggled with because there really wasn't that much romancing and Alexia, whilst prone to Lord Maccon's physique, wasn't much of a romantic either. Then there was the Steampunk which made brief appearances but didn't play a large role in the story.

Alexia, a shrewish, intellectual "over-the-hill" spinster of good fortune finds herself in a sticky situtation when vampires start to go missing and she gets involved with Lord Maccon, a scottish werewolf who is happy to overlook her tan skin, roman nose and out-spoken temperment. It had many of the mainstays of a harlequin romance: What I found I enjoyed was Alexia's voice and personality. I enjoyed her volatile relationship with Lord Maccon and I felt the story was fairly well written with good pacing and an interesting set of characters.

What I didn't like about the story, and my main gripe, is with Alexia's apparent Soullessness. Alexia states that when she discovered that she was Soulless, her answer was to go look up a bunch of greek philosophy. I do that all the time. Should I put peppercorn on my stake? Hmmmmm, what do the greek philosophers say about that? Aristotle is quoted later in regards to the soul and it is made apparent that Alexia is familiar with Aristotle.

The thing is, if she really was that familiar with Aristotle then she'd know that he believed the soul to be our very essence. Our nature. The thing that drives us.

Blameless (Parasol Protectorate, #3)

The soul of the eye is sight - and all that shit. It appears that the only downside to not having a soul is that she's not very creative and she struggles with fashion. Okay, we already knew that, but still Still, weirdly, despite the fact that she apparently struggles with fashion, she still feels she can berate her bff's horrible taste in hats.

It's quite a conundrum!

Soulless (The Parasol Protectorate)

See, now I don't believe in a lot of spiritual crap stuff. I don't believe in ghosts, crystals, chi, spiritual energy, astrology, numerology, runes, tarots, I don't think I've ever even SEEN a Ouija board. You might convince me a demon is around causing issues but I'd still rather check out whether infrasound or electromagnetic issues are what's really playing up as opposed to believe that something supernatural is going on.

I do still believe in souls though and I would tend to believe that if someone didn't have a soul then they would find it very difficult to love. All in all, I really felt like this aspect of the book was it's greatest potential that was never really even touched by the author. It seemed to be more of a trick used to lure us in.

She doesn't have a soul? Exciting, I wonder what that's like! My only other problem was with the embarrasingly horrible lemon scenes. Carriger, from what I've seen, can write a lot of things, but steamy this was not. Lastly, the visit at the end from a certain historical figure was sloppily done and I felt it detracted from what was otherwise an enjoyable story for me. So, just to recap, if you woke up this morning and dressed yourself in this: Apr 04, Helen 2.

If Charlaine Harris and Jane Austen 's ghost got together and had a love child, this book would be it. Soulless plays in Victorian era England, in an alternate world where shifters and vampires have revealed their existence to the common folk much like a historical True Blood.

Our main character is Alexia Tarabotti, a blue-stocking spinster with embarrassingly Italian blood and a preternatural - a human born without her soul. She has the ability to cancel supernatural powers by touch, which help If Charlaine Harris and Jane Austen 's ghost got together and had a love child, this book would be it.

She has the ability to cancel supernatural powers by touch, which helps her deal with Lord Maccon werewolf alpha and book BF material and a horde of vampires and evil scientists pursuing her.

Fun fun fun. Her big nose, dark complexion, and over-generous curves are a constant source of vindictive amusement to her family and societal acquaintances. Alexia also isn't your typical roundhouse-kick-to-the-ass heroine; she leaves most of the fighting work to others and uses her wits and spinster-hood to her advantage.

An entire organization is massacred over the course of the book, yet the perpetrators are met with nothing harsher than mild disapproval and an awkward air from society. Everyone acts like this is an everyday sort of experience. That was a new one for me.

Follow the Author

Anyone know those MTV contraception ads that tell you "Sex is no accident! Well in this book, it is. Blame the bumpy carriage. I have no motivation to continue with the series at the moment, but if there's a buddy read somewhere I would keep going fo sho.

View all 12 comments. My apologies to all my friends who love this book, but again, I fail to understand the appeal. Like with a few other popular novels I've tried reading recently, this is simply a glorified fanfiction in print. It's just too gratuitous and lacks substance, depth, flavor, richness, even though it, at times, entertains. View all 29 comments. Aug 20, Miriam rated it liked it Shelves: Well, the first thing I can tell you is that reading this from a critical, review-writing frame of mind is not the way to enjoy it.

I no longer live in the City and was visiting a friend who, as it turned out, wasn't home yet. Or answering her phone. Night was falling and I had no way of knowing how much time I would have to kill. This book looked light and amusing. I read it in a corner between stacks, by a window where I had good cell reception.

Since I was breaking off every ten minutes to call my friend, I did not notice the choppiness that many people complain of, and in my increasing distraction the self-consciousness of the prose was less evident. The book has a blend of humor and action that was pleasantly distracting as I worried about my friend having had a motorcycle accident or been mugged don't worry, she was fine.

I recommend this for reading in waiting rooms, or while expecting an unpleasant phone call. On rereading, the flaws are more glaring: However, I still found it a reasonably entertaining story with some good ideas.

I appreciate how Carriger plays with genres and avoids certain tropes that alienate readers who normally avoid one or more of the genres in question. For instance, there is enough romance to please romance readers without the "my Throbbing Vulva made me do it" crap that so often makes me want to throw romance novels against the wall.

And, thankfully, no rape or pseudo-rape amongst the homage to romance conventions. Likewise, there are some neat steampunkish touches without overwhelming amounts of mechanistic imagery. Some of Carriger's flaws tread very close to her positive attributes -- her tongue-in-cheek humor, for instance, is often too self-conscious and often crosses into smugness, giving the unfortunate impression that the author is too impressed by her own cleverness.

Alexia herself seems in many ways to mirror the flaws in the writing: A number of reviewers had problems with the idea of the main character being "Soulless".

I actually found this appealing, as I did not think that the author meant us to believe that Alexia actually lacked a soul as defined as the spiritual or moral aspect of human nature; rather, I thought she was setting up a commentary on authority religious, scientific, patriarchal and how it constructs identity for those under it.

My interpretation was that the soullessness was a misunderstanding by limited contemporary knowledge of how Alexia's preternatural nature functioned, and that the differences she describes in herself are essentially psychosomatic. She has been told from age 6 that she is abnormal so she believes this and constructs her understanding of herself around this flawed premise.

Any actual "abnormalities" on her part have grown out of her sense of social isolation and exceptionalism. In short, she is different because she believes that she is different. The only concrete difference we see is her effect on supernatural creatures. In an odd way this also explains the dichotomy between low self-esteem and confidence in Alexia's personality: I also thought this might be a bit of critique of High Society, in which an Italian surname is more detrimental to one's status than the lack of a soul.

Carriger specifies that Neither her family nor the members of the social circles she frequented ever noticed she was missing anything. More aggravating to me was lack of period dialogue. Of course, Carriger is hardly the only offender in this regard, but it would have been nice if she had made a bit more effort.

Even the prose has an odd feel, as if she had been trying to make it sound a certain way that she herself didn't quite understand. Like the choppiness and excessively long passages of thought during conversations, this is something that could and should be taken care of by a good editor. I thought the book as a whole had a lot of potential and hope that now that the initial excitement of being published has worn off the author will settle down to a more even style.

As it stands, I can't always tell whether Carriger is being clever, or really dumb. View all 14 comments. Sep 07, Lora rated it it was ok Recommends it for: I suppose nearly everyone, since I seem to be one of the few who doesn't like it. Every friend of mine has given this at least three stars, and here I am not even being able to finish it.

Still, I don't hate this book, so before giving my reasons for not liking it, I will be fair and go over what I did like. Our heroine, Miss Alexia Tarabotti, hasn't had an easy life. Besides being put on the shelf at the age of fifteen by her mother, she's had to deal with unjust criticism. While the people of today spend countless dollars on cancer-causing tanning beds and spray on tan in a cans that make them look like a walking Orange Julius, in Alexia's day and age it is simply not the fashion to have a little darker skin.

Nope, alabaster is where it's at! So as you can imagine, the vampires fit in quite nicely. But not our poor Miss Tarabotti! She has been shamed and ridiculed for even having lightly tanned skin practically since she popped out of her mother's womb.

And what about that dreadfully large nose Miss Tarabotti sports? Well, we can't have that , now can we? No, no, no! We'll have to take the hedge trimmers to that thing! As I'm sure a lot of people have, I've been on the receiving end of this kind of backwards thinking that Alexia's received from her family and peers, and it doesn't feel good.

So I can sympathize with Alexia. She holds her head — and her nose — high, and lets it roll off her beautifully clad shoulders. I admire that. I'm afraid that's where my interest ended. I have read of the neck nibbling or gnawing, as the case may be that ensues later on, and, for obvious reasons, I sincerely tried to make it to that part. But I guess even some good smut couldn't make me continue. For me, the writing made this nearly impossible to get into. Somehow it manages to read like fanfiction while still confusing me.

I had to reread several passages in order to get even a semblance of what was happening in some scenes. Besides these reasons, I couldn't get into the world Carriger created and, other than Miss Tarabotti, none of the characters no, not even Lord Maccon appealed to me. I realize this could've changed had I given it more time, but as of now I don't have the interest to do so. I believe that 50 - pages is enough to tell if a book is for you or not, and I gave it To all fans of this series, especially those that are my friends, I'm sorry.

I tried. View all 19 comments. Jun 28, Maureen rated it really liked it. The whole paranormal aspect was very well done and interesting to read about and I loved all the major characters! The minor characters could have been a bit better, but that's what other books are for! Can't wait to read the rest o 4. Can't wait to read the rest of this series - I'm sure it's only going to get better from here.

View 1 comment.

Apr 05, Stephen rated it really liked it Shelves: The story takes place in an alternative Victorian Lond 4.

The story takes place in an alternative Victorian London where vampires and werewolves exist and have made themselves known to the normal human population. In fact, through there very long lives and special abilities they have become very powerful in society thinking of them as the aristocracy would give you a good idea of how they are portrayed.

The main character, Alexia Tarabotti, is a spinster at the ripe old age of 26 whose half-Italian heritage and strong-willed personality make here less than perfect marriage material according to London society. In addition to her Mediterranean appearance and her sharp wit, Alexia has another very unique quality…she was born without a soul. I found this to be a very clever and unique plot device which is hard to come up with these days.

With the above as background, the plot itself is really best described as a comedy of manners combined together with a mystery involving a complex conspiracy involving forces both human and supernatural. I found the story to be engaging, the characters to be interesting and well developed and the world-building and supernatural elements to be excellent.

Overall, I really enjoyed this and plan to continue reading the series. Highly Recommended!! View all 3 comments. Dec 26, Dan Schwent rated it liked it Shelves: After Alexia Tarabotti commits a faux pas and accidentally kills a vampire at a party and falls under the eye of Lord Maccon, the Queen's investigator of the supernatural, she inadvertently gets involved in a plot involving werewolves, vampires, and deranged scientists.

Will she be able to survive whatever is going on without suffering further embarrassment? Normally, I'm so overflowing with sheer manliness that a book with this much pink on the cover would fall beneath my radar. It sounded inter After Alexia Tarabotti commits a faux pas and accidentally kills a vampire at a party and falls under the eye of Lord Maccon, the Queen's investigator of the supernatural, she inadvertently gets involved in a plot involving werewolves, vampires, and deranged scientists.

It sounded interesting though. High society, werewolves, vampires, dirigibles, what's not to like? Gail Carriger takes a fairly predictable plot and uses it to mine a rich vein of comedic gold. If Jane Austen and P. Wodehouse collaborated on a novel about werewolves and vampires, this would be it. The relationship of Lord Maccon and Alexia is straight out of every romantic comedy ever made and still comes off pretty funny.

Alexia herself is by far one of the funnier characters I've come across recently, both in dialogue and in deed. Her friend, the flamboyantly gay vampire Lord Akeldama is worth the price of admission alone. To sum up, while it has the distinctive taste of chick lit, Soulless was a pretty enjoyable read for those who like their humor to have a British flavor. And guys, it probably won't make a significant dip in your testosterone level to give it a read. View all 18 comments. May 20, Meredith Holley rated it liked it Recommended to Meredith by: Felicia Day and the creepy comic store guy.

Monsters are inevitably campy. That is a rule. Monster stories and space stories range from those that deny the campiness and try to be really soulful social commentary to those that are hilarious in acknowledging the campiness and still manage to have something brilliant to say. Thankfully, in this book, Carriger embraces the silly. The former manages to be completely serious and still not make the obvious social commentary about finite resources that was sitting right there, waiting to be made.

The latter is silly the whole time, but still has a nice, solid girl-power message. Examples abound, and my theory is that camp is inevitable in these genres if only because they involve elaborate costumes. So, embrace the camp, writers! Trying to hide it makes me embarrassed for you.

This book is a relief because Carriger combines monsters and romance and takes none of it seriously. Basically, the story is about this girl: Gerard Butler: My favorite book when I was little was The Blue Castle. In Soulless , Alexia has pretty much the same character arc, so she probably gets an automatic pass from me just for that.

That said, in my limited reading of the romance genre, the thing that I HATE THE MOST other than the rape is the idea that there is one, specific kind of beauty that you can describe using hair and breasts in a really vague, annoying way.

Same rule with enemies, but the opposite outcome. So, we all get kind of riled up when people describe women really shallowly or assume that women will be one way or another based on their looks, and with good reason. I feel like these books are almost cruel in their stereotyping of the physical appearances of men.

But why do we talk about each other with such disregard and even cruelty? Just, not to be a jerk? It bothers me when people are hurt by an attitude and then choose to perpetuate that same attitude towards others instead of reflecting on their own similar or contributing behavior.

Rant over. Carriger clearly understands my theory about the carnival nature of romance and describes the bodies with a silliness that is refreshing. I was laughing with her, not at her. Plus, it was only one book long! I can choose whether to read the next installment or not! The book was actually the length of just the one story. High fives all around for that! Jun 18, Catherine rated it it was amazing Recommended to Catherine by: I finished it with a big smile on my face and giggled almost continually while reading it.

My husband finally banished me to the bedroom because I was irritating him while he watched a movie. The world that Gail Carriger created was so much fun and so interesting. I loved seeing a familiar government amid the new and exciting facets of it.

I loved the set up of the supernatural creatures and the singular abilities of the preternatural. Who would have thought that having no soul would be so useful around vampires and werewolves? But my favorite part of the book had to be the interaction between Alexia and Lord Maccon. Alexia inherited more than her Italian ancestry from her father, she also inherited her soulless state. Alexia is firmly on the shelf and not really bothered by the fact. She goes her own way and ignores her mother whenever she gets too overbearing.

Alexia is quite unlike any other woman of her acquaintance. She's witty, opinionated, and pragmatic, but can also be quite fierce. I love how prim she can be about some things, but quite forward in others. Also, her absolute horror about her friend's ugly hats was hilarious.

I really loved how Alexia's soulless state was emphasized. She can dress well, but she never can achieve that extra pop. Her choices always reflect a lack of soul.

I thought that was a rather clever point to bring up. I also liked that the soul wasn't necessarily a religious thing. Multiple people had too much soul, although few had as little as Alexia. Alexia's friendship with the foppish Lord Akeldama was great! He was such an interesting character. His mincing around and speaking with great drama always got a smile from me.

I also loved his devoted, little harem. Three cheers to the author for creating characters that I love to pieces! One part that was so sweet was when Alexia went to wake him up to keep her promise. I had a total Awwww! Lord Maccon was so gruff and sweet. He was the perfect balance to Alexia. I loved when he was ranting about her ignoring him.

He kept talking about how it was "her turn" because he made the last move. It was very cute watching him have to be reminded that Alexia is not a werewolf so she doesn't understand what game he's playing. The sexual tension and eventual culmination of said tension was very well done. It was delicious when they finally kissed.

I can't wait to try the next book! This is definitely a series to pay attention to. I listened to this in audiobook for my reread and absolutely adored it. The narrator was fabulous and really made the story come alive.

Loved it, loved it, loved it. I always get really nervous when I write reviews for books that I have such positive reactions to, especially ones like this one that have such strong personalities. This book knows who it is and what it's trying to do and does its thing with aplomb.

I happened to love it immediately after reading the first sentence, but I can understand how if the humor in the writing or the language she uses, or if you don't like romances, or stories with their tongues f Loved it!

I happened to love it immediately after reading the first sentence, but I can understand how if the humor in the writing or the language she uses, or if you don't like romances, or stories with their tongues firmly in cheek, or stories set in Victorian England, or dirigibles, or spinsters. I could see how you might not like this book. Of course, if that's the case, I also reserve the right to think you are wrong, so so very wrong. Please go marinate yourself in your wrongness.

This book was a goddamn delight from start to finish. I don't even know what else to say.

This book was such a perfect mash-up of things I love, put together in such a very appealing way. I haven't read very many steampunk books, and I usually avoid books about werewolves and vampires unless they are heavily recommended, but the slightly skewed Victorian setting, proceeding form an alternate history where after the Renaissance and the Age of Enlightenment, the world's vampires and werewolves came out of the shadows to live among polite society, immediately caught my imagination.

The narrator had this sassy and perfect attitude, and our main character Alexia herself, not to mention the werewolf Lord Maccon, were instantly lovable. It's just, it feels like this book is mine. I can see myself becoming quite obsessed with it.

It's honestly not even that great! I mean, it's great. What I mean is that nothing it does hasn't been done before, but the way it's all put together made it seem like I'd never read anything like it before. I was giggling through half of it and swooning through more, and then being super creeped out, and then back to swooning. Literally the only complaint I have is that the narrator was a bit unidentifiable. It was a closed third person, yet also seemed to be omniscient, and switched from character to character depending on the paragraph.

If you like any of the following things, read this book immediately: View all 10 comments. Oct 11, The Flooze rated it it was amazing Recommends it for: Recommended to The Flooze by: Recipe for success: No First Book Syndrome here.

Gail Carriger shows that she is a woman with ideas in this alternate history paranormal tale.

Not only does she have ideas, but Carriger knows how to execute them. Soulless is a refreshing and wildly amusing Recipe for success: Soulless is a refreshing and wildly amusing new take on the supernatural--and on the strong, capable heroine. The characters are memorable, the writing is tight, and the banter is delightfully witty.

Her main character, Alexia Tarabotti, is a sharp and intelligent spinster whose lively conversations and astute observations belie her status of "soulless. Miss Tarabotti is very passionate about her beliefs, and more than willing to whack would-be attackers about the head with her parasol. Alexia lives in a Victorian England where vampires and werewolves are accepted by society.

She's acquainted with several members of the supernatural set--most notably the outrageous vampire Lord Akeldama he often speaks in italics, my petal , and the gruff and brawny Alpha werewolf, Lord Maccon a delicious Highland brute.

Carriger's story takes Alexia through high-society functions, human and supernatural courting rituals, familial unrest, gruesome attacks, and several instances of appalling attire. The result is enthralling, brisk, and sure to keep you smiling throughout. I wish book 2 were here already! View all 15 comments.

I haven't had this much fun reading a book in ages.Anna Bell pinned post 24 Sep Meticulously detailed and overflowing with good humor, Soulless is a like a cozy mystery run mad, set in an inventive alternate universe populated with a dizzying array of colorful characters. For me, the writing made this nearly impossible to get into. She can dress well, but she never can achieve that extra pop. Same issue I have with Pride and Prejudice But I stuck through it as a fan of the supernatural elements.

Carriger's writing is laugh-out-loud funny in some instances and solid throughout.

ELLSWORTH from Murfreesboro
I do fancy busily. Review my other posts. I take pleasure in cestoball.